Hydrogen-fuelled gas turbine engines require accurate fuel metering, but relative to kerosene systems, gaseous hydrogen introduces greater uncertainty in fuel-flow measurement and metering accuracy. This simulation-based study investigates a sonic hydrogen fuel metering valve (FMV) integrated into a hydrogen-fuelled turboshaft engine to model and evaluate alternative control strategies. Focusing on fuel-flow controllability, pressure management, disturbance sensitivity and inlet-temperature effects, it provides an original closed-loop, system-level analysis framework coupling the FMV with the engine power controller. The adopted sonic FMV reduces the minimum upstream-to-downstream pressure ratio for choking to 1.32, compared with 2.08 for a conventional design, with a 10% margin applied to both values, thereby reducing the high-pressure (HP) pump pressure requirement. Fixed- and variable-pressure delivery schemes achieved satisfactory fuel-flow tracking with an absolute relative cumulative error of 0.1%. The fixed-pressure scheme provided closer transient agreement, whereas the variable-pressure scheme reduced part-load HP-pump power by up to 67–85%. This study provides a systematic analysis of measurement-uncertainty disturbances in an end-to-end hydrogen fuel system, demonstrating that FMV dynamics effects vary with the disturbance pathway: HP-pump pressure-feedback uncertainty produced the largest FMV dynamic deviations in fuel flow, high-pressure compressor exit pressure, and combustor outlet temperature, compared with power-turbine feedback and FMV inlet-temperature uncertainty. These findings indicate robust hydrogen fuel system design and control should prioritise validated and filtered power-feedback measurements, pressure sensing close to the FMV inlet, monitoring of the FMV pressure ratio to preserve the choking margin and FMV inlet temperature measurement to maintain metering authority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebrahimi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: