Key result
Applying age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds reduced the estimated prevalence of metabolic syndrome by 0.2-11.9% across sex, BMI, and age clusters.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components across sex, BMI, and age clusters, and how do age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds affect this prevalence?
Cross-Sectional (n=74,531)
What is the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components across sex, BMI, and age clusters, and how do age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds affect this prevalence?
Applying age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds significantly reduces the estimated prevalence of metabolic syndrome, suggesting that strict thresholds may lead to overestimation.
Suggests strict static thresholds may overestimate metabolic syndrome burden; leaves open whether age-adjusted criteria improve.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components within sex-, body mass index (BMI)- and age combined clusters. In addition, we used the age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds to demonstrate the effect on the prevalence of MetS and elevated blood pressure. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 74,531 Western European participants, aged 18-79 years, were used from the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study. MetS was defined according to the revised NCEP-ATPIII. Age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds were defined as recommended by the eight reports of the Joint National Committee (≥140/90 mmHg for those aged <60 years, and ≥150/90 mmHg for those aged ≥60 years). RESULTS: 19.2% men and 12.1% women had MetS. MetS prevalence increased with BMI and age. Independent of BMI, abdominal obesity dominated MetS prevalence especially in women, while elevated blood pressure was already highly prevalent among young men. Applying age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds resulted in a 0.2-11.9% prevalence drop in MetS and 6.0-36.3% prevalence drop in elevated blood pressure, within the combined sex, BMI and age clusters. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a gender disparity with age and BMI for the prevalence of MetS and, especially, abdominal obesity and elevated blood pressure. The strict threshold level for elevated blood pressure in the revised NCEP-ATPIII, results in an overestimation of MetS prevalence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slagter et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=74,531). Age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds vs. Standard NCEP-ATPIII thresholds was evaluated on Prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Applying age-adjusted blood pressure thresholds reduced the estimated prevalence of metabolic syndrome by 0.2-11.9% across sex, BMI, and age clusters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: