Key result
Incorporating ultrasound and MRI imaging goals in treat-to-target strategies for rheumatoid arthritis has not documented an overall benefit, but may aid in drug tapering decisions.
Why the study?
Subclinical inflammation is frequent in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission, questioning whether relying solely on clinical composite scores as treatment targets is appropriate.
Does incorporating modern imaging (ultrasound and MRI) goals in treat-to-target strategies improve outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission?
Does incorporating modern imaging (ultrasound and MRI) goals in treat-to-target strategies improve outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission?
While modern imaging detects subclinical inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission, incorporating imaging goals into treat-to-target strategies has not shown overall benefit due to increased adverse events, though it may aid in drug tapering decisions.
May inform selective drug tapering in RA; leaves open need for higher-level trials before routine imaging integration.
Clinical remission has become an achievable target for the majority of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but subclinical inflammation as assessed by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to be frequent in patients in clinical remission. Subclinical synovitis has been shown to be linked to both subsequent structural damage progression and a risk of flare, demonstrating that subclinical synovitis represents incomplete suppression of inflammation and questions whether it is appropriate only to use clinical composite scores as treatment target in clinical practice. Maintaining a state of remission has proven important as sustained clinical remission impacts long-term outcome regarding joint damage progression, physical function and quality of life. Treating subclinical inflammation has been attempted and has led to more frequent strict clinical remission and better physical function, but also to more adverse events. Thus, an overall benefit of incorporating imaging goals in treat-to-target strategies has not been documented. However, in patients in clinical remission on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, both ultrasound and MRI may aid in the clinical decision regarding whether drug tapering or even discontinuation should be attempted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terslev et al. (2021) conducted a review in Rheumatoid arthritis. Modern imaging (ultrasound and MRI) was evaluated. Incorporating ultrasound and MRI imaging goals in treat-to-target strategies for rheumatoid arthritis has not documented an overall benefit, but may aid in drug tapering decisions.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: