Key result
Higher neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio linked to ~74% higher all-cause mortality in acute HF.
Why the study?
The prognostic role of the neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) in acute heart failure remains unclear.
Does higher neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) predict mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=4,622)
Yes
Does higher neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) predict mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.74 (95% CI 1.52–1.99)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with acute heart failure, a higher neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio independently predicts an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, providing incremental prognostic value over hs-CRP.
NPAR may refine mortality prognostication beyond hs-CRP in acute HF; leaves open its role in risk stratification or therapy guidance.
Background: The neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) is a novel inflammatory marker. However, its prognostic role in acute heart failure (AHF) remains unclear. Methods: This post hoc analysis included 4622 patients with AHF from a nationwide prospective cohort in China. The outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular mortality (CVM), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and hospitalization for HF (HHF). Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the associations between NPAR and outcomes. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), 4-year time-dependent continuous net reclassification improvement (cNRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results: During a median follow-up of 4.61 years, higher NPAR and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) showed positive graded associations with mortality. Compared with the lowest NPAR quartile, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.29 (1.12-1.47), 1.38 (1.20-1.58), and 1.74 (1.52-1.99) for ACM, and 1.30 (1.10-1.53), 1.39 (1.18-1.63), and 1.72 (1.46-2.03) for CVM, respectively (all P < 0.001). Similar graded associations were observed for 1-year MACE and HHF. Adding NPAR to the primary multivariable model improved the predictive ability for ACM (C-index from 0.693 to 0.701; cNRI 9.90%; IDI 1.20%) and CVM (C-index from 0.705 to 0.712; cNRI 9.30%; IDI 1.00%) (all P < 0.001). NPAR outperformed hs-CRP for mortality prediction, whereas their combination did not further improve model performance. Conclusion: NPAR was positively associated with risks of ACM, CVM, MACE, and HHF and provided incremental prognostic value for mortality beyond hs-CRP. NPAR may be useful for prognostic risk assessment in AHF and warrants further investigation as a potential alternative to hs-CRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Heart Failure (AHF) (n=4,622). Neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) vs. Lowest NPAR quartile (< 15.3) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.52-1.99, p=<0.001). In patients with acute heart failure, a higher neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (highest vs lowest quartile) was associated with a 74% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.74).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: