This paper applies a historical structural, regulation-theoretical approach to interpret Swedish economic policy in the 1980s. It is argued that the market-oriented long-term assumptions of the 'third way' were flawed, and constituted an inadequate response to the crisis of the Swedish (Rehn-Meidner) Model. It violated the already increasingly brittle terms of legitimation of the 'moral economy' of solidaristic wage policy. Although such a violation was reasonable, necessary (and accepted by the trade unions) in the short run, the failure of the policy to achieve a progressive trajectory in the transformation from Fordism to post-Fordism made it impossible to reproduce the conditions of the 'moral economy'. The paper is especially critical of the use of a 'norms-based' monetary policy, and the marginalization of collective capital formation policy and active industrial policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnus Ryner (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: