Key result
The analytical agreement between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays was 95.2% in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction, though cTnI reached higher peak concentrations faster in diagnosed MI.
Why the study?
Potential disparities in cTn concentrations, trajectories, and mortality following initial measurement warranted further investigation to help guide clinicians treating patients suspected of MI.
Does high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement agree with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=503)
No
Does high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement agree with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction?
High-sensitivity cTnT and cTnI assays show high analytical agreement (95.2%) in patients suspected of MI, although cTnI reaches higher peak concentrations more quickly.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High agreement supports interchangeable hs-cTn use in suspected AMI; leaves open impact of faster cTnI kinetics on diagnostic timing.
Measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) is the cornerstone in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Potential disparities in concentrations of cTn, trajectories and mortality, following initial measurement warrant further investigation. Such data may guide clinicians treating patients suspected of MI. Plasma concentrations of cTnT and cTnI were measured in 503 consecutive patients at Aarhus University Hospital between June 13th and June 27th, 2019. cTnT was measured with the Roche cobas® E602 hs-cTnT assay, while cTnI was measured with the Siemens ADVIA Centaur® XPT hs-cTnI assay. Analytical agreement was determined based on assay-specific 99th percentiles. Medical records were reviewed for adjudication of the MI diagnosis. MI was the final diagnosis in 65 patients (12.9%) and the analytical agreement between cTnT and cTnI assays was 95.2%. For patients diagnosed with MI, cTnI reached higher peak concentrations in shorter time, compared to cTnT. All-cause mortality risk increased with increasing levels of both biomarkers. In this study, the analytical agreement of two cTn assays was high. However, some disparities in troponin trajectories were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleemeier et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=503). High-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay vs. High-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay was evaluated on Analytical agreement between cTnT and cTnI assays based on assay-specific 99th percentiles. The analytical agreement between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays was 95.2% in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction, though cTnI reached higher peak concentrations faster in diagnosed MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: