Key result
A second peak of hs-cTnT after an acute myocardial infarction was not associated with a significantly different risk of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, or rehospitalization (adjusted HR 0.78).
Why the study?
Repeated biomarker measurement after acute MI is common despite lacking guideline recommendation, and the prognostic impact of a second hs-cTnT peak remains unclear.
Does a second peak of hs-cTnT increase the risk of a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization and rehospitalization in patients with myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=192)
No
Does a second peak of hs-cTnT increase the risk of a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization and rehospitalization in patients with myocardial infarction?
A second peak of hs-cTnT after an acute MI is common but not associated with poorer clinical outcomes, suggesting limited prognostic value for routine monitoring in this phase.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Second hs-cTnT peak after MI does not appear to modify prognosis; leaves open whether serial troponin monitoring refines risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: After an acute myocardial infarction (MI), repeated measurement of cardiac biomarkers is commonly performed, although not recommended in current guidelines. There is only limited data on the kinetics of troponin in this phase. For high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), but not high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), late increases in terms of a second peak have been described. Their impact on the prognosis of patients with MI remains unclear. METHODS: We included 2,305 patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of MI. Five hundred and seven were diagnosed with MI. Hs-cTnT, creatine kinase (CK) and the MB fraction of CK (CK-MB) were measured at admission, after 1 and 3 h and thereafter as indicated by the treating physician. A mixed-model approach was applied for modeling the biomarker kinetics. All patients were followed up to assess a composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization and rehospitalization and to investigate the effect of a second hs-cTnT peak on prognosis. RESULTS: Out of 507 patients with MI, 192 had a sufficient amount of hs-cTnT measurements after the index MI. In 111 (57.8%) patients a second hs-cTnT peak was found after 4.48 days. For CK and CK-MB a second peak could not be identified. Regarding the composite endpoint there was no significant difference between patients with and without a second hs-cTnT peak. CONCLUSION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02355457, Date of registration: February 4, 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartikainen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial Infarction (n=192). Second peak of hs-cTnT vs. No second peak of hs-cTnT was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization and rehospitalization (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.28, p=0.33). A second peak of hs-cTnT after an acute myocardial infarction was not associated with a significantly different risk of mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, or rehospitalization (adjusted HR 0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: