Why the study?
While the clinical importance of cardiac troponin is well known in type 1 MI, evidence regarding high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations in type 2 MI is limited.
Do high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations predict all-cause mortality and major adverse events in patients with type 2 NSTEMI?
Do high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations predict all-cause mortality and major adverse events in patients with type 2 NSTEMI?
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations independently predict adverse outcomes in type 2 NSTEMI, with prognostic implications similar to those in type 1 NSTEMI.
May enhance risk stratification in type 2 NSTEMI; hypothesis-generating for whether hs-cTnT should guide therapy.
BACKGROUND: While the clinical importance of cardiac troponin is well-known in type 1 myocardial infarction (MI), evidence on this topic in type 2 MI is limited. We assessed the clinical and prognostic implications of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) concentrations in a large sample of patients with type 2 MI. METHODS: Retrospective registry-based cohort study (SWEDEHEART) including 4607 patients with type 2 MI and 43,405 patients with type 1 MI, used for comparisons. Patients with ST-elevation MI were excluded. Multivariable-adjusted regressions were applied to investigate the associations of hs-cTnT concentrations (highest measured value during each hospitalization) with clinical variables and prognosis during a median follow-up of up to 1.9 years. RESULTS: Hs-cTnT concentrations (median 264 [25th, 75th percentiles 112-654] ng/L) were significantly associated with various cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities in type 2 non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) but only weakly with the underlying triggering condition. Most of these findings including the magnitude of hs-cTn release were similar to type 1 NSTEMI. Hs-cTnT (ln) independently predicted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 1.09-1.17]) and major adverse events (hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 1.10-1.17]) in type 2 NSTEMI, similar as for type 1 NSTEMI according to interaction analysis. The associations of hs-cTnT (ln) with poor prognosis tended to be stronger in type 2 NSTEMI patients without known cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hs-cTnT concentrations independently predict adverse outcome in type 2 NSTEMI. The similarities to type 1 NSTEMI however, are striking and emphasize the difficulty to distinguish both MI types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eggers et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: