Key result
In patients with chronic kidney disease, highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays frequently detect elevated levels without acute MI, necessitating the evaluation of trends over several hours.
Why the study?
How should high-sensitivity cardiac troponin results be interpreted for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
How should high-sensitivity cardiac troponin results be interpreted for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Physicians should rely on serial trends rather than absolute cutoffs of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin to accurately diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Cardiac troponin assays have become an indispensable tool in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, asymptomatic patients with chronic kidney disease often exhibit elevated levels of cardiac troponins with near ubiquitous detection using the new high-sensitive assays. This poses a challenge to physicians faced with differentiating between acute MI and a noncardiac etiology of chest pain or equivalent. Rather than rely on absolute cutoffs it is necessary to follow trends in levels at least over several hours. Even in the absence of an acute MI there is an association between chronic elevations of these biomarkers, underlying structural heart disease and poor prognosis. Although in the chronic setting the underlying cause of cardiac troponin elevation is likely a combination of factors, it should prompt further investigation for modifiable risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
End et al. (2013) conducted a review in Chronic kidney disease and suspected acute myocardial infarction. Highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays was evaluated. In patients with chronic kidney disease, highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays frequently detect elevated levels without acute MI, necessitating the evaluation of trends over several hours.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: