Why the study?
Does the use of a laparoscope reduce surgical site infection rates across different NNIS basic SSI risk index categories in surgical patients?
Does the use of a laparoscope reduce surgical site infection rates across different NNIS basic SSI risk index categories in surgical patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The NNIS basic SSI risk index effectively predicts surgical site infection risk, and the use of a laparoscope independently lowers this risk for certain procedures, warranting index modification.
By use of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System's surgical patient surveillance component protocol, the NNIS basic risk index was examined to predict the risk of a surgical site infection (SSI). The NNIS basic SSI risk index is composed of the following criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3, 4, or 5; wound class; and duration of surgery. The effect when a laparoscope was used was also determined. Overall, for 34 of the 44 NNIS procedure categories, SSI rates increased significantly (P< .05) with the number of risk factors present. With regard to cholecystectomy and colon surgery, the SSI rate was significantly lower when the procedure was done laparoscopically within each risk index category. With regard to appendectomy and gastric surgery, use of a laparoscope affected SSI rates only when no other risk factors were present. The NNIS basic SSI index is useful for risk adjustment for a wide variety of procedures. For 4 operations, the use of a laparoscope lowered SSI risk, requiring modification of the NNIS basic SSI risk index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaynes et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: