Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 11, 1995New England Journal of MedicineOpen Access

A Comparison of Lipiodol Chemoembolization and Conservative Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

A 1995 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c8ea980d29ce2cbfaaf9ehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199505113321903
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experience with liver resection after hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma1993 · 105 citations
  2. 2Transcatheter oily chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.1989 · 477 citations
  3. 3Prognostic factors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial embolization and arterial infusion1991 · 130 citations
  4. 4Phase Ii Study of Transarterial Embolization in European Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Need for Controlled Trials1994 · 81 citations
  5. 5Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.1990 · 170 citations