Key result
Short DAPT shows comparable 3-year net clinical events to 12-month therapy after PCI.
Why the study?
Following demonstrated non-inferiority of 3-to-6-month DAPT to 12-month DAPT at 1 year, the long-term outcomes of abbreviated antiplatelet therapy after PCI with third-generation DES remained to be evaluated.
Does 3-to-6-month DAPT reduce net adverse clinical events compared to 12-month DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES?
RCT (n=2,013)
Open-label, adjudicator-blinded
Randomised in blocks of eight without stratification
Yes
Does 3-to-6-month DAPT reduce net adverse clinical events compared to 12-month DAPT in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES?
Abbreviated 3-to-6-month DAPT is safe and effective up to 3 years after PCI with third-generation DES, while extending DAPT beyond 1 year increases bleeding risk without ischemic benefit.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“This study extends the clinical follow-up of the HOST-IDEA trial to 3 years and shows comparable long-term outcomes between 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT after third-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Continuation of DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding without a clear reduction in ischemic events. These findings support the long-term safety and efficacy of abbreviated DAPT in the contemporary drug-eluting stent era.”
“bleeding rates were quite low and their event rates, in general, were extremely low, meaning the comparison was underpowered for superiority and almost not even there for noninferiority.”
3-to-6-month DAPT remains noninferior at 3 years after third-generation DES; extends 1-year HOST-IDEA findings and supports abbreviated regimens in practice.
Background The HOST-IDEA trial demonstrated non-inferiority of 3-to-6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to 12-month DAPT for net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of abbreviated antiplatelet therapy following PCI with third-generation DES. Methods In the open-label, adjudicator-blinded, multicentre, randomised HOST-IDEA trial, 2013 patients from 37 hospitals in South Korea were randomly allocated to 3-to-6-month (n = 1002) or 12-month (n = 1011) DAPT between January 2016 and May 2021. The primary outcome was NACE at 3 years, comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), stent thrombosis, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5). Major secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF)—comprising cardiac death, TVMI, and CD-TLR—and major bleeding at 3 years. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of >1-year DAPT, patients event-free at 1 year were classified into >1-year and ≤1-year DAPT groups and matched using a propensity score. These 3-year clinical outcomes were prespecified in the published protocol as mandatory clinical follow-up. HOST-IDEA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02601157. Findings At 3 years, clinical follow-up was completed in 955 patients (95.3%) and 966 patients (95.5%) in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 1095 days (IQR 1095–1095). The primary outcome occurred in 7.7% and 8.2% of patients in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.69–1.29; P = 0.71). The risks of TLF (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.62–1.36; P = 0.66) and major bleeding (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.59–1.56; P = 0.88) were comparable between the two groups. Among patients who were event-free at 1 year, 583 remained on DAPT, while 1259 switched to single antiplatelet therapy within the 1 year. In the matched cohort, there was some evidence of a higher risk of TLF in the >1-year DAPT group (HR 2.56; 95% CI 0.99–6.60; P = 0.05), whereas major bleeding risk was significantly higher with >1-year DAPT (HR 4.44; 95% CI 1.26–15.57; P = 0.02). Interpretation 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT showed comparable 3-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES. However, extending DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with increased major bleeding without additional ischemic benefits. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and identify patient subsets who may benefit from extended DAPT. Funding Biotronik Korea (Seongnam si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) and B. Braun Korea (Seoul, South Korea).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with third-generation drug-eluting stents (n=2,013). 3-to-6-month dual antiplatelet therapy vs. 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 3 years (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.29, p=0.71). 3-to-6-month dual antiplatelet therapy resulted in comparable rates of net adverse clinical events at 3 years compared to 12-month therapy in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: