Key result
S2TOP-BLEED score modestly predicts 3-year major bleeding risk after TIA or ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Can the S2TOP-BLEED score predict 3-year major bleeding risk in patients with TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=43,112)
Yes
Can the S2TOP-BLEED score predict 3-year major bleeding risk in patients with TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet therapy?
The S2TOP-BLEED score provides a modest but validated tool to estimate 3-year major bleeding risk in patients with TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet therapy using readily available clinical characteristics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid antithrombotic decisions in TIA/stroke; confirms modest discrimination across meta-analyzed cohorts.
Objective: To develop and externally validate a prediction model for major bleeding in patients with a TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet agents. Methods: We combined individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials (CAPRIE, ESPS-2, MATCH, CHARISMA, ESPRIT, and PRoFESS) investigating antiplatelet therapy after TIA or ischemic stroke. Cox regression analyses stratified by trial were performed to study the association between predictors and major bleeding. A risk prediction model was derived and validated in the PERFORM trial. Performance was assessed with the c statistic and calibration plots. Results: Major bleeding occurred in 1,530 of the 43,112 patients during 94,833 person-years of follow-up. The observed 3-year risk of major bleeding was 4.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4%–4.9%). Predictors were male sex, smoking, type of antiplatelet agents (aspirin-clopidogrel), outcome on modified Rankin Scale ≥3, prior stroke, high blood pressure, lower body mass index, elderly, Asian ethnicity, and diabetes (S₂TOP-BLEED). The S₂TOP-BLEED score had a c statistic of 0.63 (95% CI 0.60–0.64) and showed good calibration in the development data. Major bleeding risk ranged from 2% in patients aged 45–54 years without additional risk factors to more than 10% in patients aged 75–84 years with multiple risk factors. In external validation, the model had a c statistic of 0.61 (95% CI 0.59–0.63) and slightly underestimated major bleeding risk. Conclusions: The S₂TOP-BLEED score can be used to estimate 3-year major bleeding risk in patients with a TIA or ischemic stroke who use antiplatelet agents, based on readily available characteristics. The discriminatory performance may be improved by identifying stronger predictors of major bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilkens et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Noncardioembolic TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelet therapy (n=43,112). S2TOP-BLEED risk prediction model (including aspirin-clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy and clinical predictors) vs. Aspirin (+/- dipyridamole) reference for antiplatelet predictor was evaluated on Major bleeding (fatal, intracranial, requiring hospital admission, or leading to significant disability) at 3 years (c statistic 0.63 (development); 0.61 (validation); HR 1.73 for aspirin-clopidogrel vs aspirin, 95% CI 0.60-0.64). The S2TOP-BLEED score predicted 3-year major bleeding risk in patients with TIA or ischemic stroke on antiplatelets with a c-statistic of 0.63 in development and 0.61 in validation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: