Key result
Multivariate assessment of cardiopulmonary exercise variables, including peak VO2, VEN/VCO2 slope, EOV, and PETCO2, is encouraged for diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluating interventions in heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multivariate assessment of cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables, including EOV and PETCO2, enhances diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in heart failure.
Exercise intolerance is a hallmark feature of chronic heart failure and is associated with poor prognosis. This review provides an update on cardiopulmonary exercise variables, proven to be prognostically important in heart failure. Besides the widely accepted peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) and VEN/VCO2 slope, other exercise variables - exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) and partial pressure of end-tidal CO2, (PETCO2) - should gain attention in the interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. In addition to prognosis, the pathophysiological origin is also discussed. Different mechanisms underlie these exercise variables with an important contribution of haemodynamic, pulmonary and peripheral abnormalities. Given the different pathophysiological origin, a multivariate assessment with the inclusion of all the aforementioned parameters should be encouraged, not only for diagnostic and prognostic purposes but also for evaluating the effect of interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pardaens et al. (2013) conducted a review in chronic heart failure. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables (peak VO2, VEN/VCO2 slope, EOV, PETCO2) was evaluated. Multivariate assessment of cardiopulmonary exercise variables, including peak VO2, VEN/VCO2 slope, EOV, and PETCO2, is encouraged for diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluating interventions in heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: