This document provides expert consensus recommendations on the indications, technical performance, and training for catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians should now prioritize ablation after AAD failure in symptomatic paroxysmal AF; confirms Class I status from accumulated RCTs.
Catheter ablation of AF is a very commonly performed procedure in hospitals throughout the world. Surgical ablation of AF, although less widely available than catheter-based AF ablation, is also an important therapeutic option for patients with AF at many major medical centers. This document provides an up-to-date review of the indications, techniques, and outcomes of catheter and surgical ablation of AF. Areas for which a consensus can be reached concerning AF ablation are identified, and a series of consensus definitions have been developed for use in future clinical trials of AF ablation. Also included within this document are recommendations concerning indications for AF ablation, technical performance of this procedure, and training. It is our hope to improve patient care by providing a foundation for those involved with care of patients with AF as well as those who perform AF ablation. It is recognized that this field continues to evolve rapidly and that this document will need to be updated. Successful AF ablation programs optimally should consist of a cooperative team of cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and surgeons to ensure appropriate indications, procedure selection, and follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calkins et al. (2017) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation vs. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy or medical management was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: