This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: The skin-to-blood route is traditionally considered the main pathway in Candida late-onset sepsis (LOS) development in preterm infants. However, emerging evidence suggests that the gut also serves as a source of infection. We aimed to characterize fecal mycobiota and microbiota profiles preceding onset of Candida LOS to assess the role of the preterm gut microbiome in disease development. METHODS: This multicenter case-control study included very preterm infants (<30 weeks of gestation) with Candida LOS. Each case was matched to nonaffected controls by gestational and postnatal age, hospital site, and/or cumulative antibiotic exposure prior to day of LOS onset (t = 0). Fecal samples collected at t = 0 and the 5 preceding days were analyzed by ITS1 and 16S RNA sequencing. Microbial amplicon yields, composition, and interkingdom correlations were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2397 screened infants, fecal samples were available for 8 of 19 infants with Candida LOS. In these 8 cases, the ITS/16S amplicon yield ratio was increased (P < .001), and the relative abundance of fecal Candida albicans correlated positively with fungal amplicon yield (ρ = 0.71, adjusted P = .005), suggesting increased absolute abundance up to 5 days before onset. Additionally, bacterial yields were significantly lower (P = .02) and α-diversity significantly decreased (P = .012) when compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Increased fecal C albicans preceded Candida LOS onset, implicating the preterm gut as a potential source of infection. Reduced bacterial yields and diversity suggest ecological alterations that may facilitate Candida pathogenicity in the preterm gut. These findings support further research into gut-derived Candida LOS and the potential for microbiota-targeted prevention strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kroon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: