Why the study?
Does intra-arterial cisplatin and etoposide improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?
Does intra-arterial cisplatin and etoposide improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?
Intra-arterial cisplatin and etoposide has anti-tumor activity in advanced HCC but is associated with high mortality in patients with cirrhosis.
May support activity in advanced HCC but should not change practice; leaves open randomized confirmation and cirrhosis safety.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of an intra-arterially delivered combination chemotherapy in a group of patients with regionally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: 26 patients with proven locally advanced HCC treated with hepatic artery infusion of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2), days 1-5) and etoposide (75 mg/m(2), days 1-5) every 4 weeks were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, overall and complete response rates were 38 and 7%, respectively. Median duration of response was 5 months. Median survival time was 10 months and survival rates at 6, 12 and 24 months were 53, 33 and 24%, respectively. Survival was significantly longer for responders than for non-responders (median: 13 and 3 months, respectively). There were 4 treatment-related deaths among cirrhotics. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial chemotherapy using cisplatin and etoposide seems to have some anti-tumor effect against advanced HCC, although a high rate of life- threatening complications precludes the indication of this regimen at least for patients with non-compensated cirrhosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangro et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: