Key result
Real-time image-guided left ventricular lead implantation resulted in pacing significantly closer to the target area compared to standard implantation without real-time guidance (8 mm vs 26 mm, p=0.04).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of intra-procedural visualization of optimal pacing sites and image-guided LV lead placement during CRT.
Does real-time image-guided LV lead placement improve pacing site accuracy in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=15)
No
Does real-time image-guided LV lead placement improve pacing site accuracy in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 26%
p-value: p=0.04
Real-time image-guided LV lead implantation using CMR and CT overlay is feasible and improves the accuracy of lead placement in CRT.
Feasibility of real-time guidance shown; hypothesis-generating for CRT outcomes and requires randomized confirmation.
This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-procedural visualization of optimal pacing sites and image-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In fifteen patients (10 males, 68 ± 11 years, 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction of 26 ± 5%), optimal pacing sites were identified pre-procedurally using cardiac imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived scar and dyssynchrony maps were created for all patients. In six patients the anatomy of the left phrenic nerve (LPN) and coronary sinus ostium was assessed via a computed tomography (CT) scan. By overlaying the CMR and CT dataset onto live fluoroscopy, aforementioned structures were visualized during LV lead implantation. In the first nine patients, the platform was tested, yet, no real-time image-guidance was implemented. In the last six patients real-time image-guided LV lead placement was successfully executed. CRT implant and fluoroscopy times were similar to previous procedures and all leads were placed close to the target area but away from scarred myocardium and the LPN. Patients that received real-time image-guided LV lead implantation were paced closer to the target area compared to patients that did not receive real-time image-guidance (8 mm [IQR 0-22] vs 26 mm [IQR 17-46], p = 0.04), and displayed marked LV reverse remodeling at 6 months follow up with a mean LVESV change of -30 ± 10% and a mean LVEF improvement of 15 ± 5%. Real-time image-guided LV lead implantation is feasible and may prove useful for achieving the optimal LV lead position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salden et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=15). Real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement vs. Treatment planning without real-time image-guidance was evaluated on Distance to target site (mm) (p=0.04). Real-time image-guided left ventricular lead implantation resulted in pacing significantly closer to the target area compared to standard implantation without real-time guidance (8 mm vs 26 mm, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: