Key result
Off-line ultrasound measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and plaque thickness demonstrated reliable intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, with an inter-reader bias of 0.004 mm for left CCA IMT.
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Single-blind
No
Carotid wall structural measurements on B-mode ultrasound demonstrate reliable intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, supporting their use in population cohorts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports off-line carotid IMT use in research cohorts; leaves open standardization for clinical practice.
INTRODUCTION: Common carotid artery (CCA) intima-media thickness (IMT), lumen diameter, and maximum plaque thickness were assessed on ultrasound images. The objective of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the measurements following a standardised protocol. METHODS: Two readers performed the off-line measurements on B-mode ultrasound images of the distal CCA, in a randomly selected subset (n = 60) from a Flemish population cohort (FLEMENGHO). We calculated the coefficient of variation, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and reproducibility according to the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The intra-reader bias for the measurements of left and right side CCA IMT were -0.003 ± 0.04 mm (p = 0.55) and 0.01 ± 0.04 mm (p = 0.03), respectively. The intra-reader bias of the lumen diameter was -0.04 ± 0.25 mm (p = 0.27) for the left and 0.02 ± 0.22 mm (p = 0.45) for the right side. The measurements for the maximum plaque thickness showed no intra-reader differences with bias 0.07 ± 0.2 mm (p = 0.26) for the left and -0.03 ± 0.2 mm (p = 0.55) for the right side. The inter-reader analysis showed good reproducibility for the left and right side CCA IMT with bias 0.004 ± 0.06 mm (p = 0.57) and -0.008 ± 0.05 mm (p = 0.19), respectively, but the lumen diameter measurements showed inter-reader differences, with bias 0.17 ± 0.27 mm (p < 0.0001) for the left and 0.10 ± 0.21 mm (p = 0.0006) for the right side. The inter-reader bias for the maximum plaque thickness were 0.07 ± 0.2 mm (p = 0.21) and -0.1 ± 0.4 mm (p = 0.26) for the left and right side, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated a reliable reproducibility of carotid wall structural measurements, allowing for an adequate further analysis of the entire population cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Efremov et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic individuals (n=60). Carotid ultrasound image post-processing vs. Inter-reader comparison was evaluated on Inter-reader reproducibility of left common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA IMT) (bias 0.004 mm, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02, p=0.57). Off-line ultrasound measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and plaque thickness demonstrated reliable intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, with an inter-reader bias of 0.004 mm for left CCA IMT.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: