This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper analyzes the role of intermediaries in providing immediacy in fast markets. Fast markets are modelled as contests with the possibility of multiple winners where the probability of casting the best quote depends on prior technology investments. Depending on the market design, equilibrium pricing by intermediaries involves a trade-off, between monopolistic price distortion and excess volatility. Since equilibrium at the pricing stage generates an externality, investments into faster trading technologies are necessarily asymmetric in equilibrium, akin to markets with vertical product differentiation. Further, equilibrium is not necessarily efficient, since it is possible that a high-cost intermediary ends up investing excessively and thus trades more frequently than low-cost rivals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gehrig et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: