We study the abundance of silicon in the intergalactic medium by analyzing the statistics of Si IV, C IV, and H I pixel optical depths in a sample of 19 high-quality quasar absorption spectra, which we compare with realistic spectra drawn from a hydrodynamical simulation. Simulations with a constant and uniform Si/C ratio, a C distribution as derived in Paper II of this series, and a UV background (UVB) model from Haardt & Madau reproduce the observed trends in the ratio of Si IV and C IV optical depths, τ /τ . The ratio τ /τ depends strongly on τ , but it is nearly independent of redshift for fixed τ and is inconsistent with a sharp change in the hardness of the UVB at z ≈ 3. Scaling the simulated optical depth ratios gives a measurement of the global Si/C ratio (using our fiducial UVB, which includes both galaxy and quasar contributions) of = 0.77 ± 0.05, with a possible systematic error of ~0.1 dex. The inferred [Si/C] depends on the shape of the UVB (harder backgrounds leading to higher [Si/C]), ranging from ≃ 1.5 for a quasar-only UVB to ≃ 0.25 for a UVB including both galaxies and artificial softening; this provides the dominant uncertainty in the overall [Si/C]. Examination of the full τ /τ distribution yields no evidence for inhomogeneity in [Si/C] and constrains the width of a lognormal probability distribution in [Si/C] to be much smaller than that of [C/H]; this implies a common origin for Si and C. Since the inferred [Si/C] depends on the UVB shape, this also suggests that inhomogeneities in the hardness of the UVB are small. There is no evidence for evolution in [Si/C]. Variation in the inferred [Si/C] with density depends on the UVB and rules out the quasar-only model unless [Si/C] increases sharply at low density. Comparisons with low-metallicity halo stars and nucleosynthetic yields suggest either that our fiducial UVB is too hard or that supermassive Population III stars might have to be included. The inferred [Si/C], if extrapolated to low density, corresponds to a contribution to the cosmic Si abundance of = -2.0, or Ω Si ≃ 3.2 × 10 -7 , a significant fraction of all Si production expected by z ≈ 3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguirre et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: