Key result
Titration of guideline-directed medical therapy improved secondary mitral regurgitation severity by at least one degree in 39% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the importance of optimizing guideline-directed medical therapy to address left ventricular remodeling and reduce secondary mitral regurgitation in HFrEF patients.
This editorial refers to ‘Guideline directed medical therapy and reduction of secondary mitral regurgitation’ by Spinka G. et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeac068. Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is frequently observed in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).1,2 In these patients, left ventricular (LV) remodelling results in papillary muscle displacement and tethering of the mitral valve leaflets, thereby disturbing the delicate balance between tethering and closing forces. Significant SMR increases the pulsatile load on the left atrium and the pulmonary vasculature and causes an additional volume overload on the failing LV, thereby increasing diastolic wall stress and accelerating LV adverse remodelling.3,4 It is therefore not surprising that SMR is associated with reduced quality of life as well as an increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality.1,2 Significant efforts have been undertaken to reduce SMR severity and improve...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stassen et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and secondary mitral regurgitation (n=261). Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) titration vs. Maximally tolerated GDMT (titration not in progress) was evaluated on Reduction of SMR by at least one degree. Titration of guideline-directed medical therapy improved secondary mitral regurgitation severity by at least one degree in 39% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: