Key result
Intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying peripherally inserted central catheter tip position in cancer patients demonstrated a 93.7% matching rate with chest X-ray.
Why the study?
The feasibility and accuracy of intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying PICC tip position in cancer patients during follow-up required evaluation.
Does intracavitary electrocardiogram accurately verify the tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters compared to chest X-ray in adult cancer patients?
Observational (n=126)
Yes
Does intracavitary electrocardiogram accurately verify the tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters compared to chest X-ray in adult cancer patients?
Intracavitary electrocardiogram is a feasible and accurate method for verifying PICC tip position in adult cancer patients, matching chest X-ray in 93.7% of cases.
May support intracavitary ECG for PICC verification in cancer patients; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients during follow-up period. METHODS: From March 2015 to October 2015, 126 patients involved in eight hospitals who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter placement received intracavitary electrocardiogram and chest X-ray to verify position of the catheter tip during follow-up period. Their intracavitary electrocardiogram was compared with surface electrocardiogram to judge catheter tip landing zone in one of three different anatomical zones. The amplitude of intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave and the ratio of intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave were measured and showed correlation with catheter tip position confirmed by chest X-ray. Based on chest X-ray principle, all the cases were assigned into three intracavitary electrocardiogram groups to explore the optimal cut-off values for intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave and intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: No technique-related complications or adverse events occurred in this study. The matching rate between intracavitary electrocardiogram and chest X-ray method was 93.7%. The optimal cut-off values for intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave were set from 3.15 to 3.75 mV, and intracavitary electrocardiogram P wave/surface electrocardiogram P wave from 1.65 to 3.25. CONCLUSIONS: It is demonstrated in this retrospective multicenter study that the intracavitary electrocardiogram method for verifying tip position of peripherally inserted central catheter during follow-up period is feasible and accurate in all adult patients with cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (n=126). Intracavitary electrocardiogram vs. Chest X-ray was evaluated on Matching rate between intracavitary electrocardiogram and chest X-ray method. Intracavitary electrocardiogram for verifying peripherally inserted central catheter tip position in cancer patients demonstrated a 93.7% matching rate with chest X-ray.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: