Key result
Acute eccentric and concentric arm cycling both significantly reduced peripheral arterial stiffness at 10 minutes post-exercise (p < 0.05) without altering central arterial stiffness.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether a single session of upper-body eccentric exercise reduces arterial stiffness in participants who have undergone progressive training.
Does acute upper-body eccentric arm cycling reduce arterial stiffness in healthy individuals compared to concentric arm cycling?
Does acute upper-body eccentric arm cycling reduce arterial stiffness in healthy individuals compared to concentric arm cycling?
Acute eccentric arm cycling provides a high-force, low-energy-cost form of resistance exercise that acutely reduces arm arterial stiffness similarly to concentric cycling, but with a more rapid heart rate recovery.
Acute eccentric arm cycling may reduce arterial stiffness similarly to concentric in trained adults; hypothesis-generating, needs confirmation before clinical consideration.
International Journal of Exercise Science 15(2): 884-895, 2022. Upper-body resistance exercise effectively increases muscular strength, but may concomitantly increase arterial stiffness. Eccentric exercise can lead to muscle soreness and arterial stiffness in untrained participants. However, it is unclear if upper-body eccentric exercise could reduce arterial stiffness in a single session for participants that have undergone progressive training. Our purpose was to compare acute responses to upper-body eccentric (novel, ECCarm) and concentric (traditional, CONarm) steady state arm cycling. We hypothesized that arm arterial stiffness would be reduced after both ECCarm and CONarm. Twenty-two young healthy individuals performed either ECCarm (n = 11) or CONarm (n = 11) at ~70% of peak heart rate for 20 min after a training period. Heart rate, central pulse wave velocity (cPWV), and peripheral pulse wave velocity (pPWV; i.e., arm arterial stiffness) were assessed before, 10 min, and 30 min after exercise. Heart rate was not elevated at 10 min post ECCarm, but was elevated at 10- and 30-min post CONarm (p < 0.01). After exercise, pPWV was decreased at 10 min post for both ECCarm (7.1 ± 0.3 vs. 6.5 ± 0.2 m/s) and CONarm (7.0 ± 0.2 vs. 6.5 ± 0.2 m/s; p < 0.05), while both groups returned to baseline values 30 min post. cPWV did not change in either group. Our results indicate that acute ECCarm provides a high-force, low energy cost form of resistance exercise that acutely reduces arm arterial stiffness. The reduction in pPWV and rapid heart rate recovery suggests that ECCarm is a safe form of exercise for overall and cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakeham et al. (2022) studied Healthy (n=22). Eccentric arm cycling (ECCarm) vs. Concentric arm cycling (CONarm) was evaluated on Peripheral pulse wave velocity (pPWV) at 10 minutes post-exercise (p=<0.05). Acute eccentric and concentric arm cycling both significantly reduced peripheral arterial stiffness at 10 minutes post-exercise (p < 0.05) without altering central arterial stiffness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: