Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of a metastatic site may differ from that of the primary site. This difference may influence patient prognosis and response to therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization to compare human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in primary and metastatic breast cancers. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in this study. Conversion from hormone receptor positive in the primary tumor to hormone receptor negative in the metastasis occurred in 12 patients (21.4%), and hormone receptor negative to hormone receptor positive conversion occurred in two patients (3.6%). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was discordant between primary and metastatic lesions in seven patients (12.5%). All of the five patients who converted from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative status to human epidermal growth factor receptor positive received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate and median progression-free survival for concordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients were 69.2% and 16.9 months, whereas that of patients with positive conversion of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 were 40.0% and 7.6 months, respectively (overall response rate; P = 0.169 and progression-free survival; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Discordance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor status between primary and metastatic tumors was observed, which led to altered treatment decisions. Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor in metastatic tumors should be considered in patients with breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: