The use of high-efficiency HVAC filters is a common strategy to control exposure to airborne particulate matter in residential buildings. However, high-efficiency filters generally have a higher pressure drop and are widely assumed to have large energy penalties. In this paper, we explore the underlying theoretical energy implications of high-pressure-drop filters and we present the results of a four-month-long period of detailed energy monitoring of two air-conditioning systems in a test home in Austin, Texas. A theoretical analysis shows that the magnitude of potential energy impacts associated with high-efficiency filters are overall likely to be small and can result in either a net savings or additional expenditure, depending on the system. The measured results in the test systems confirm these findings, and energy consumption generally did not differ with high-efficiency filters compared to low-efficiency filters. These results suggest caution when assuming that high-efficiency filters require more energy than low-pressure-drop filters in residential HVAC systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephens et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: