Key result
Cell-based immunoassays (ELISPOT) detected specific cellular responses within 3-6 days following infection with various pathogens in animal models, 3-5 days earlier than serum antibodies.
Why the study?
Pathogen identification typically requires isolating the pathogen or retrospective antibody testing, leaving a need to evaluate cell-based immunoassays for early pathogen detection.
Does cell-based activation immunoassay allow for earlier detection of pathogen infection compared to serum antibodies in animal models?
Does cell-based activation immunoassay allow for earlier detection of pathogen infection compared to serum antibodies in animal models?
Cell-based immunoassays (ELISPOT) can detect pathogen infections 3-5 days earlier than traditional serum antibody tests in animal models.
Cell-based assays detect infection within days post-exposure; leaves open clinical adoption pending human validation studies.
Diagnostic identification of pathogens is usually accomplished by isolation of the pathogen or its substances, and should correlate with the time and site of infection. Alternatively, immunoassays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for quantification of serum antibodies are expedient and are usually employed for retrospective diagnostic of a particular infective agent. Here, the potential of cell-based immunoassays for early pathogen detection was evaluated by quantification of specific, antigen-activated, low-frequency IFNγ-secreting cells in mouse spleens following infection with various pathogens. Using enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays, specific responses were observed within 3–6 days following infection with F. tularensis, B. anthracis, Y. pestis, or Influenza virus. Blood samples collected from F. tularensis-infected mice revealed the presence of IFNγ-producing activated cells within one week post infection. When non-human primates were infected with B. anthracis, cellular response was observed in peripheral blood samples as early as five days post infection, 3–5 days earlier than serum antibodies. Finally, the expression pattern of genes in splenocytes of F. tularensis-infected mice was inspected by a transcriptomic approach, enabling the identification of potential host targets for the future development of genetic-based cellular immunoassays. Altogether, the data demonstrate the potential of cell-based immunoassays for early pathogen detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bar‐Haim et al. (2019) studied Pathogen infection. Cell-based immunoassays (ELISPOT) vs. Serum antibodies (ELISA) was evaluated on Detection of specific, antigen-activated, low-frequency IFNγ-secreting cells. Cell-based immunoassays (ELISPOT) detected specific cellular responses within 3-6 days following infection with various pathogens in animal models, 3-5 days earlier than serum antibodies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: