Key result
Left ventricular free wall rupture is a lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction with a mortality rate of 75% to 90%, accounting for 20% of in-hospital deaths after AMI.
This editorial highlights the clinical significance of a meta-analysis on the management of left ventricular free wall rupture, a rare but highly lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction.
Left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is a most rare but often lethal mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The mortality rate for LVFWR is described from 75% to 90% and it is the cause for 20% of in-hospital deaths after AMI. Death results essentially from the limited time available for emergent intervention after onset of symptoms. Emergency surgery is indicated and normally the rupture site is easily identified, but it may not be apparent macroscopically, corresponding to transmyocardial or subepicardial dissection with an external rupture far from the infarction site, or already thrombosed and contained. Repair of the ventricular wall is usually achieved either by suturing the edges of the tear or closing it with patches of artificial material or biological tissues, usually using some kind of biological glue. However, several cases of successful conservative management have been described. In this Editorial, I comment on the metanalysis conducted by Matteucci et al, published in this issue of the Journal, including 11 non-randomized studies and enrolling a total of 363 patients, which brings a great deal of new knowledge that can help not only in the prevention but also in the management of this dreadful complication of AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuel J. Antunes (2021) conducted an editorial in Left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) after acute myocardial infarction (n=363). Left ventricular free wall rupture is a lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction with a mortality rate of 75% to 90%, accounting for 20% of in-hospital deaths after AMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: