Why the study?
What are the determinants of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
What are the determinants of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ICDs are effective for preventing sudden cardiac death, but inappropriate discharges are common (33%), especially in younger patients and those with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Younger age and AF history were associated with more inappropriate ICD discharges in HCM; leaves open prospective validation of tailored programming.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the determinants of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: ICD clinic at an academic hospital. PATIENTS: 61 patients with HCM who received ICDs for the primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). OUTCOME MEASURES: (a) Analysis of appropriate and inappropriate ICD discharges; (b) predictors of ICD discharges. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age at ICD insertion was 46 (18) years (range 10-79). Follow-up time was 40 (27) months (range 7-151). Eight patients experienced an appropriate discharge, occurring 24.5 (13.6) months after ICD insertion. Appropriate ICD intervention was more common in the secondary (36%) than the primary (8%) prevention group (p = 0.02). Inappropriate ICD discharges occurred in 20 (33%) patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified two significant predictors of inappropriate ICD discharges: (a) age <30 years at the time of ICD insertion (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.0; p = 0.03) and (b) history of atrial fibrillation (HR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 8.1; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: ICDs are effective in the prevention of SCD in HCM. However, there is a high incidence of inappropriate ICD discharges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woo et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: