Why the study?
Features of circulatory autonomic regulation in patients undergoing CABG or correction of valvular heart disease needed investigation.
Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared to valvular heart disease correction affect circulatory autonomic regulation in cardiac surgery patients?
Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared to valvular heart disease correction affect circulatory autonomic regulation in cardiac surgery patients?
Circulatory autonomic regulation indices, including heart rate variability and synchronization index, do not significantly differ between patients undergoing CABG versus valvular heart disease correction, despite differences in baseline clinical status and surgical procedures.
Autonomic profiles after CABG or CVHD may differ by procedure; leaves open their value for risk stratification.
The objective of our study was to investigate the features of circulatory autonomic regulation in the patients with a coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or correction of a valvular heart disease (CVHD). Material and Methods. Our study enrolled 42 patients (including 12 women) aged 63 (57; 67), who underwent CABG; and 36 patients (including 16 women) aged 58 (47; 65), who underwent CVHD. Simultaneous 15-minute recordings of electrocardiograms and photoplethysmograms (PPG) were performed on all patients before and after the surgery. We assessed and analyzed statistical and frequency-related measures of heart rate variability (HRV) and index of synchronization (S) among low-frequency (LF) oscillations in HRV and PPG. Results. The values of most autonomic regulation indices in our study did not have statistically significant differences among the patients with CABG and CVHD at all stages of research. The exception was represented by the heart rate, which was higher before CVHD (p=0.013). Conclusion. In all patients with CABG, the values of HRV and S did not depend on the differences in their clinical statuses or performed cardiac surgical interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiselev et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: