Why the study?
Does caponization affect atherosclerosis and cardiovascular variables in hypertensive and hypotensive turkeys?
Does caponization affect atherosclerosis and cardiovascular variables in hypertensive and hypotensive turkeys?
In a turkey model, caponization did not significantly affect atherosclerosis severity, suggesting male sex hormones do not drive atherogenic stimuli in this context.
Caponization leaves plaque severity unchanged in turkeys; leaves open whether male sex hormones influence atherosclerosis in avian models.
Effects of caponization and blood pressure selection on serum lipids, severity of atherosclerosis, body weight, hematocrit, and relative ventricular weight in hypertensive and hypotensive lines of turkeys were evaluated in two trials. At 8 weeks of age, half the turkeys from each line were caponized. Body weights, blood pressure, and blood samples were obtained from each treatment at 8, 20, and 30 weeks of age. A total of 56 and 72 birds were used in Trials 1 and 2, respectively. Birds were necropsied at 30 weeks of age. Hypertensive turkeys had significantly greater serum cholesterol and total lipid than hypotensive turkeys only at 30 weeks of age in Trial 1. Lower relative ventricular weights were observed in hypotensive turkeys within both trials. Hypertensive birds exhibited a more severe degree of atherosclerosis and higher relative heart weight than hypotensive turkeys. Caponization significantly increased total serum lipid only at 20 weeks of age in Trial 2. Average body weight of caponized turkeys was significantly lower (1.2) than the control turkeys at 30 weeks of age. Caponized turkeys exhibited lower relative ventricular weight in Trial 1 but not Trial 2 and an increase in blood pressure only in Trial 2. Caponization suppressed body weight, decreased hematocrit values, and had no significant effect upon plaque severity. The presence or absence of male sex hormones had virtually no effect on proposed atherogenic stimuli thereby suggesting another mechanism by which the female is afforded a higher degree of protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: