Why the study?
There is a lack of consensus regarding the preoperative fasting period for gum chewing due to conflicting evidence.
Does preoperative sugarless gum chewing increase gastric fluid volume or reduce pH in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia?
Does preoperative sugarless gum chewing increase gastric fluid volume or reduce pH in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia?
Preoperative sugarless gum chewing does not significantly increase gastric fluid volume or acidity, and it effectively reduces preoperative anxiety in healthy adults undergoing elective surgery.
Chewing sugarless gum preoperatively does not alter gastric volume or pH; leaves open revision of fasting guidelines.
There is a lack of consensus regarding the preoperative fasting period on gum chewing due to conflicting evidence. Our study aimed to determine the effects of preoperative sugarless gum chewing on gastric fluid volume and pH. This prospective randomised study was performed on patients who underwent elective operation under general anaesthesia. Sixty patients who fasted overnight were randomly assigned to either “non-chewing gum” as control or “chewing gum group” as intervention group who chewed one piece of gum upon the call to the operating theatre. They were further enquired whether gum chewing helped cope with hunger and reduced anxiety. Gastric volume and pH were determined immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Gum chewing had no significant effect on gastric fluid volume measured [30.4+13.6 (control) vs 29.1+11.6 ml (intervention), p = 0.693] and gastric fluid pH [1.4+0.4 (control) vs 1.6+0.4 (intervention), p = 0.05] while managing to reduce anxiety in 90.3% patients who chewed gum. Pre-operative gum-chewing did not increase in gastric fluid volume or a further reduction in gastric fluid acidity and was able to reduce anxiety in patients in the preoperative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joanna Ooi Su Min (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: