Why the study?
Ecological momentary assessment studies show substantial fluctuations in cardiac interoception in everyday life, but whether physiological stress indicated by additional heart rate variability reduction could differentially predict cardiac interoceptive accuracy and sensibility was unknown.
Does additional heart rate variability reduction predict fluctuations in cardiac interoceptive accuracy and sensibility in everyday life?
Does additional heart rate variability reduction predict fluctuations in cardiac interoceptive accuracy and sensibility in everyday life?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physiological stress, indicated by additional heart rate variability reductions, predicts poorer cardiac interoceptive accuracy and higher sensibility in daily life.
Cardiac interoception, assessed in terms of accuracy (IAcc) and sensibility (IS; beside others), is important for health and wellbeing. Ecological momentary assessment studies exploring the dynamics of cardiac interoception showed substantial fluctuations of IAcc and IS in everyday life. States of increased (physiologically indicated) stress, such as decreased heart rate variability (HRV), may hamper interoceptive skills, while more relaxed states (higher HRV) seem to go along with increased IAcc. We built on this and investigated if higher (physiological) stress indicated via HRV reductions independent of metabolic needs (i.e., additional HRV reduction, AddHRVr) could (differentially) predict IAcc and IS, respectively. In an initial sample of 119 participants, with data of (up to) three consecutive days, we simulated the predictive value of AddHRVr. We found that AddHRVr before an ambulatory cardiac interoception task predicted poor IAcc and higher IS. We replicated this pattern of findings in an independent sample of 66 participants. Both studies provide first insights into the dynamics of IAcc and IS in daily life, which seems to differ when following AddHRVr. This lays the groundwork for just in time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) supporting individuals in states of high vulnerability and promoting cardiac interoceptive skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rominger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: