Combined ScS‐S differential attenuation and travel‐time studies, with data from temporary and permanent arrays, produce quality factor, Q μ (D″), estimates for D″ beneath Central America. Similarities between S and ScS ray paths through the upper mantle reduce the upper mantle elastic and anelastic contributions to differential studies. Differential attenuation correlates with ScS attenuation but not S attenuation, indicating that the attenuation primarily stems from lower mantle interactions. We image a ∼250 km wide high‐attenuation low‐velocity anomaly within a ∼600 km wide low‐attenuation high‐velocity region at the core‐mantle boundary (CMB). The observed inverse exponential relationship between attenuation and velocity is consistent with a 200 ± 50 km thermal anomaly, but does not preclude chemical, phase, or structural variations. Observation of a small‐scale thermal anomaly within D″ may provide significant evidence in favor one kind of plume formation at the CMB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: