Why the study?
Protamine sulfate, the only approved antidote for UFH, has adverse effects, only partially neutralizes LMWHs, and is ineffective for fondaparinux.
Do cationic porous supramolecular organic frameworks and porous organic polymers improve the neutralization of heparin anticoagulants compared to protamine in preclinical models?
Do cationic porous supramolecular organic frameworks and porous organic polymers improve the neutralization of heparin anticoagulants compared to protamine in preclinical models?
Porous polymers (SOFs and POPs) may serve as effective and safe universal reversal agents for various heparin anticoagulants, including those poorly neutralized by protamine.
Cationic porous materials neutralize diverse heparins preclinically; leaves open safe clinical translation as protamine alternatives.
Heparins are widely used anticoagulants for surgical procedures and extracorporeal therapies. However, all of them have bleeding risks. Protamine sulfate, the only clinically approved antidote for unfractionated heparin (UFH), has adverse effects. Moreover, protamine can only partially neutralize low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and is not effective for fondaparinux. Here, an inclusion-sequestration strategy for efficient neutralization of heparin anticoagulants by cationic porous supramolecular organic frameworks (SOFs) and porous organic polymers (POPs) is reported. Isothermal titration calorimetric and fluorescence experiments show strong binding affinities of these porous polymers toward heparins, whereas dynamic light scattering and zeta potential analysis confirm that the heparin sequences are adsorbed into the interior of the porous hosts. Activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-FXa, and thromboelastography assays indicate that their neutralization efficacies are higher than or as high as that of protamine for UFH and generally superior to protamine for LMWHs and fondaparinux, which is further confirmed by tail-transection model in mice and ex vivo aPTT or anti-FXa analysis in rats. Acute toxicity evaluations reveal that one of the SOFs displays outstanding biocompatibility. This work suggests that porous polymers can supply safe and rapid reversal of clinically used heparins, as protamine surrogates, providing an improved approach for their neutralization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: