Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 24, 2000Archives of Internal Medicine

A Meta-analysis Comparing Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins With Unfractionated Heparin in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Jeffrey S. GinsbergJeffrey S. GinsbergVascular MedicineJDJames D. DouketisVascular MedicineAHAnne HolbrookVascular Medicine

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ginsberg et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cb40cfd7ae2306b77125ehttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.2.181
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Subcutaneous Low Molecular Weight Heparin versus Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Polish Multicenter Trial1992 · 147 citations
  2. 2Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis with a Very Low Molecular Weight Heparin Fragment (CY 222)2009 · 18 citations
  3. 3Comparison of Once-Daily Subcutaneous Fragmin® with Continuous Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis1994 · 212 citations
  4. 4Subcutaneous Heparin Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Comparison of Unfractionated and Low Molecular Weight Heparin2009 · 139 citations
  5. 5Comparing Subcutaneous Danaparoid with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism1995 · 88 citations