Why the study?
Does neuronostatin affect cardiac contractile function in adult male C57 BL/6 mice?
Does neuronostatin affect cardiac contractile function in adult male C57 BL/6 mice?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neuronostatin exerts potent cardiac depressant effects in mice, likely through inhibition of SERCA phosphorylation and AMPK activation.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Neuronostatin, derived from the somatostatin preprohormone, was recently identified to be produced by several tissues exerting a role in cardiovascular regulation and metabolism. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism behind neuronostatin-elicited myocardial responses remains elusive. METHODS: This study was designed to elucidate the impact of neuronostatin on cardiac contractile function and the underlying mechanism of action involved. Adult male C57 BL/6 mice were subjected to a bolus injection of neuronostatin (50 μg/kg, i.p.). Echocardiographic, cardiomyocyte contractile and intracellular Ca2+ handling properties were monitored to evaluate the effect of neuronostatin on cardiac function. Western blot analysis was used to examine potential signaling mechanisms involved. RESULTS: Neuronostatin administration suppressed myocardial and cardiomyocyte contractile function and disturbed intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. We observed enlarged LVESD (with unchanged LVEDD), reduced fractional shortening, depressed peak shortening, maximal velocity of shortening/relengthening, resting and electrically-stimulated rise in intracellular Ca2+, and prolonged relengthening duration in hearts from neuronostatin-treated mice. These effects were accompanied by downregulation of phosphorylation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+- ATPase (SERCA) and phospholamban (PLB) and activation of AMPK. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the cardiac depressant properties of neuronostatin possibly associated with loss of SERCA phosphorylation and AMPK activation. These findings revealed a potent inhibitory capacity for neuronostatin on cardiac function, the physiological relevance of which deserves further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: