Why the study?
Does copeptin testing improve diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction compared to routine biomarkers?
Does copeptin testing improve diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction compared to routine biomarkers?
This review summarizes evidence on copeptin as a promising novel biomarker for early diagnosis and risk stratification in suspected acute myocardial infarction.
Copeptin should not yet guide AMI evaluation or risk stratification; leaves open its additive diagnostic value pending prospective validation.
Suspected acute myocardial infarction is one of the leading causes of admission to emergency departments. In the last decade, biomarkers revolutionized the management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Besides their pivotal assistance in timely diagnosis, biomarkers provide additional information for risk stratification. Cardiac troponins I and T are the most sensitive and specific markers of acute myocardial injury. Nonetheless, in order to overcome the remaining limitations of these markers, novel candidate biomarkers sensitive to early stage of disease are being extensively investigated. Among them, copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin, emerged as a promising biomarker for the evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. In this review, we summarize the currently available evidence for the usefulness of copeptin in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in comparison with routine biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinstadler et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: