Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We sought to establish a benchmark for complications using frame-based stereotactic surgery for both deep and lobar brain surgery. During a 28-year interval, we performed frame-based stereotactic surgery in 2,651 patients. Our database was retrospectively used to assess the risks of complications after frame-based stereotactic surgery. Routine immediate intraoperative imaging detected new blood products after diagnostic biopsy in 43 cases (2.6%); only 6 patients (0.36%) required craniotomy for hematoma evacuation. Perioperative seizures occurred in 6 patients (0.36%), and 2 patients developed burr hole site infections. One patient (1%) developed an intra-abscess hemorrhage after biopsy and catheter drainage. Two deaths (0.08%) related to surgery occurred. Some centers are currently migrating to frameless, even pinless, neuronavigation-guided needle procedures for both lobar and deep brain targets. Although experimental accuracy under optimal conditions is reported to be similar to that of frame-based systems, the complication rates from a significant number of cases have yet to be reported. This report establishes the safety profile of frame-based stereotactic surgery based on a 28-year period. These results may serve as a benchmark against which free-hand or guided neuronavigation approaches may be measured, as both the advantages and risks of such procedures are assessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lunsford et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: