Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electronic structures in solid-state transition-metal compounds can be represented by two parameters: the charge-transfer energy (Δ), which is the energy difference between the p-band of an anion and an upper Hubbard band contributed by transition-metal d-orbitals, and the onsite Coulomb repulsion energy ( U ), which represents the energy difference between lower and upper Hubbard bands composed of split d-orbitals in transition metals. These parameters can facilitate the classification of various types of electronic structures. In this study, the dependences of anion species (N 3–, P 3–, As 3–, O 2–, S 2–, Se 2–, Te 2–, F –, Cl –, Br –, and I – ) on Δ and U of 566 different binary and ternary 3d transition-metal compounds were investigated using ionic-model calculations. We were able to identify the systematic chemical trends in the variations in Δ and U values with the anion species of 11 different families of 3d transition-metal compounds in a comprehensive manner. The effective use of Δ− U diagrams given here, to facilitate the discovery and development of functional compounds, was demonstrated on thermoelectric compounds by classifying the thermoelectric properties of 3d transition-metal compounds and by predicting unrealized high-performance thermoelectric compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohkubo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: