Why the study?
Bedside volume status assessment is challenging without a reliable, easily accessible gold-standard test, requiring physicians to understand available non-invasive clinical tools.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Volume status assessment lacks a reliable gold standard, warranting cautious clinical interpretation; leaves open need for validated bedside tools.
Assessment of patients' volume status at the bedside is a very important clinical skill that physicians need in many clinical scenarios. Hypovolemia with hypotension and tissue under-perfusion are usually more alarming to physicians, but hypervolemia is also associated with poor outcomes, making euvolemia a crucial goal in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the assessment of volume status can be challenging, especially in the absence of a gold standard test that is reliable and easily accessible to assist with clinical decision-making. Physicians need to have a broad knowledge of the individual non-invasive clinical tools available for them at the bedside to evaluate volume status. In this review, we will discuss the strengths and limitations of the traditional tools, which include careful history taking, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests, and also include the relatively new tool of point-of-care ultrasound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhassan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: