Why the study?
Traditional bedside assessments of volume status are often unreliable and limited by patient body habitus.
Does point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) improve the assessment of volume status compared to traditional bedside assessments?
Does point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) improve the assessment of volume status compared to traditional bedside assessments?
Point-of-care ultrasound is a valuable and accurate adjunct to traditional clinical assessment for determining a patient's volume status at the bedside.
May aid bedside volume assessment when traditional methods falter; leaves open validation in larger cohorts before practice change.
Determining volume status at the bedside is an essential skill clinicians must possess. Unfortunately, traditional bedside assessments, including measuring vital signs, obtaining a history, and performing a physical examination, are often unreliable and limited by patient body habitus. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable and accurate adjunct to aid in determination of a patient's volume status. POCUS of the lungs, heart, inferior vena cava, and internal jugular vein can add valuable data for clinicians when determining volume status. Specifically, lung ultrasound is more accurate than physical examination and chest radiography in detecting pulmonary edema and pleural effusions; cardiac POCUS allows for qualitative estimations of left ventricle and right ventricle function and can confirm the presence or absence of clinically significant pericardial effusions; and POCUS of the inferior vena cava and internal jugular vein can estimate right atrial pressure, and in the appropriate clinical context, help to determine intravascular volume status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragaisis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: