Why the study?
Does off-pump CABG compared to conventional CABG improve the recovery of heart rate variability following a short-term inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program?
Does off-pump CABG compared to conventional CABG improve the recovery of heart rate variability following a short-term inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program?
Off-pump CABG combined with early inpatient cardiac rehabilitation is associated with better recovery of cardiac autonomic function compared to conventional CABG.
May support OPCAB for autonomic recovery post-rehab; leaves open need for RCTs on outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery may produce different patients' outcomes, including the extent of cardiac autonomic (CA) imbalance. The beneficial effects of an exercise-based inpatient programme on heart rate variability (HRV) for C-CABG patients have already been demonstrated by our group. However, there are no studies about the impact of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on HRV behaviour after OPCAB. The aim of this study is to compare the influence of both operative techniques on HRV pattern following CR in the postoperative (PO) period. METHODS: Cardiac autonomic function was evaluated by HRV indices pre- and post-CR in patients undergoing C-CABG (n = 15) and OPCAB (n = 13). All patients participated in a short-term (approximately 5 days) supervised CR programme of early mobilization, consisting of progressive exercises, from active-assistive movements at PO day 1 to climbing flights of stairs at PO day 5. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a reduction in HRV following surgery. The CR programme promoted improvements in HRV indices at discharge for both groups. The OPCAB group presented with higher HRV values at discharge, compared to the C-CABG group, indicating a better recovery of CA function. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients submitted to OPCAB and an inpatient CR programme present with greater improvement in CA function compared to C-CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pantoni et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: