Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Kidney disease impacts long-term outcomes of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). This post-hoc analysis evaluated avacopan effect in a subgroup of patients with GPA or MPA and kidney involvement at baseline from the ADVOCATE trial. Methods The analysis included a study population of 268 patients (of 330 patients, 81.2%). Key efficacy outcomes were remission at week 26, sustained remission at week 52, and relapse after remission through week 52. Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed overall and stratified by baseline eGFR categories (≥90, 60-89, 45-59, 30-44, and 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Additional outcomes were changes in albuminuria and hematuria, glucocorticoid use, Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI), and safety. Results Remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52 were achieved by 99/134 (73.9%) and 91/134 (67.9%) patients in the avacopan group and 95/134 (70.9%) and 76/134 (56.7%) in the prednisone taper group. Relapse rate after remission was lower in the avacopan than the prednisone taper group (9.4% vs 20.9%; HR [95% CI], 0.43 [0.22, 0.85]). Recovery of kidney function, speed of reduction in albuminuria and hematuria, and changes in GTI favored the avacopan group. No new safety issues were reported for this subset of patients. Conclusion In patients with GPA or MPA with kidney involvement, treatment with an avacopan regimen compared with a prednisone taper regimen achieved similar rates of remission, improved recovery of kidney function, led to faster reduction in albuminuria and hematuria, and lowered glucocorticoid-related toxicity, with an acceptable safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geetha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: