Why the study?
Is transcatheter closure of VSD safe in patients with mild aortic valve prolapse and aortic regurgitation?
Is transcatheter closure of VSD safe in patients with mild aortic valve prolapse and aortic regurgitation?
Transcatheter closure of VSD in the presence of mild aortic valve prolapse and mild aortic regurgitation appears feasible but carries a risk of device-related complications and AR progression.
Supports caution for transcatheter VSD closure in mild AR; leaves open need for prospective safety data.
OBJECTIVE: To report intermediate follow-up result of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD) in presence of aortic valve prolapse (AVP) with or without aortic regurgitation (AR). METHOD: This is a retrospective review of 19 patients with VSD with AVP with AR who underwent transcatheter closure in between September 2011-July 2014. Mean age was 8 years (1-16 years, standard deviation [SD] 4.08 years) and mean weight was 26.03kg (9-81.5kg, SD 16.57kg). Among them 2 had subarterial VSD, 6 had subaortic VSD and 11 had perimembranous VSD. All of them had mild AVP and 13 of them had AR (trivial or mild). Median VSD size was 4.3mm (4-6mm). Transcatheter closure was done either by retrograde technique using the Amplatzer Duct Occluder-II in 17 patients or antegrade technique using the Duct Occluder-I in 2 cases. Mean follow-up period was 18 months (12-36 months). RESULT: Immediate major complications were encountered in 2 (10.5%) cases. Significant aggravation of device related AR was seen in one case & device embolised to right pulmonary artery in another case and both of them were managed surgically. During follow up, 1 child had significant additional VSD requiring device closure. One child developed moderate AR, requiring surgery. None of the other had shown any increase in severity of AR. CONCLUSION: Device closure of VSD in presence of mild AVP and mild AR appears to be safe. Longer follow-up is necessary to draw final conclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: