Why the study?
Most cancer survivorship rehabilitation programs consist of supervised exercise, leaving limited data on the effects of unsupervised or home-based exercise interventions.
Does an individualized home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program improve physical and physiologic parameters in cancer survivors compared to healthy controls?
Does an individualized home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program improve physical and physiologic parameters in cancer survivors compared to healthy controls?
Individually-prescribed home-based exercise programs for cancer survivors are safe and result in modest improvements in body composition and strength without adverse cardiac effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of home-based exercise in cancer survivors; leaves open comparative efficacy versus supervised programs.
BACKGROUND: Aerobic and resistance exercises have been promoted recently to improve quality of life in cancer patients. Most cancer survivorship rehabilitation programs consist of supervised exercise programs; however, less data is available on the effects of unsupervised or home-based exercise interventions. The study aimed to compare the physical and physiologic changes in a group of cancer survivors (CS) and a control group of non-cancer, health controls (HC) who participated in individualized home-based aerobic and resistance exercises for 12 months. METHODS: Thirty-three surviving cancer survivors (CS) aged 55.6±3 years were enrolled for 1 year of unsupervised exercise prescription programs. Anthropometric parameters hydration status, fitness, and echocardiographic examination were measured every six month and compared to10 HC (aged 52.6±7.7 years) individuals prior to starting the program (t0) and at 6 (t6) and 12 (t12) months. RESULTS: Among the CS subjects, a significant reductions in waist circumference (t0: 97.5±15.2 cm, t6: 86.6±13.5 cm, t12: 85.8±13.9 cm; P<0.05), body cell mass (t0: 50.9±4.7%, t6: 52.3±4.4%, t12: 53.7±3.7%; P<0.05), and extracellular mass (t0: 49.1±4.7%, t6: 47.6±4.4%, t12: 46.2±3.7%; P<0.05) were observed, as well significant improvements in lower body muscle strength (chair test t0: 13.3±4.1, t6: 14.2±3.5, t12: 15.1±3.2; P<0.05). Changes in functionality and heart function were similar between CS and HC. CONCLUSIONS: Individually-prescribed home-based exercise programs were cost effective, safe and resulted in modest improvements in body composition, strength, and total body water distribution with little to no adverse effect on cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefani et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: