Why the study?
Visceral angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma, and determinants of patient outcomes require evaluation using nationwide data.
What are the determinants of overall survival in patients with visceral angiosarcoma?
What are the determinants of overall survival in patients with visceral angiosarcoma?
In patients with visceral angiosarcoma, overall survival is poor, but multimodal therapy including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy is associated with improved survival.
Visceral angiosarcoma outcomes require cautious interpretation in practice; this Level 4 analysis leaves open prospective validation of prognostic factors.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Visceral angiosarcoma is rare and aggressive, accounting for 2% of soft tissue sarcomas. Using a national data set, we examine determinants of outcomes for patients presenting with this rare disease. METHODS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with visceral angiosarcoma. Trends in treatment and outcomes were examined. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were assessed with log-rank and Cox regression. RESULTS: Eight hundred and ninety-three patients with visceral angiosarcoma were identified (median age 65 years, male [63%], Charlson comorbidity index <1 [86%]). Tumor size was <5 cm in 20.7%, and 34.2% were moderate/high grade. Median OS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.4). By multivariate analysis, increased tumor grade and size, and liver/biliary origin demonstrated worse OS while surgery, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy demonstrated improved OS (all p < 0.001). Survival was similar between patients achieving R0 resection and those with R1/2 resection receiving chemotherapy by Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral angiosarcomas are rare tumors with poor outcomes. Liver/biliary origin, higher tumor grade, and larger tumor size demonstrate worse outcomes. While R0 resection remains the mainstay of treatment, patients with R1/R2 resection have improved survival with addition of chemotherapy. Consideration should be made for multimodal therapy in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendrick et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: