Why the study?
Ventricular septal rupture after myocardial infarction is a rare but lethal complication, prompting an analysis of long-term results and risk factors for survival across treatment approaches.
Do transcatheter intervention or surgical repair improve survival compared to medical therapy in patients with post-infarction ventricular septal rupture?
Do transcatheter intervention or surgical repair improve survival compared to medical therapy in patients with post-infarction ventricular septal rupture?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surgical repair and transcatheter intervention are associated with significantly better 30-day and long-term survival compared to medical therapy alone in patients with post-infarction ventricular septal rupture.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following myocardial infarction (MI) is a rare but lethal complication. We analyzed the long-term results and risk factors for survival in the treatment of VSR. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2021, 115 consecutive patients with post-MI VSR were admitted to our hospital. Depending on different treatment methods patients were divided into following three groups: medical, transcatheter intervention, and surgical repair. During the study, relevant clinical data, operation-related conditions, and follow-up data were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to determine the cumulative incidence of mortality. The independent risk factors for patient mortality were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 43.4 ± 34.7 months. The overall in-hospital, 30-day, and long-term mortality rates were 24.3%, 38.3%, and 51.3%, respectively. In the medical group, the in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 46.7 % (21/45) and 82.2 % (37/45), respectively, with only three patients alive at follow-up. In the transcatheter intervention group, 30-day and long-term mortality rates were 12% and 28%, respectively. In the surgical repair group, 30-day and long-term mortality rates were 8.9% and 22.2%, respectively. Compared with the surgery-group patients, patients with transcatheter intervention had a longer time from VSR to intervention. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, previous infarction, Killip class, serum creatinine, Troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and medical strategy were risk factors for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day and long-term outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair and transcatheter intervention were significantly better than medically treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: