Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 22, 2004BMJOpen Access

Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PMPhilippe MichelHospices Civils de Lyon

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Philippe Michel (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cc261a64782d1c66eeb46https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7433.199
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reliability and Validity of Judgments Concerning Adverse Events Suffered by Hospitalized Patients1989 · 153 citations
  2. 2Incidence and Predictors of Severe Obstetric Morbidity: Case-Control Study2002 · 138 citations
  3. 3Discrepancies Between Explicit and Implicit Review: Physician and Nurse Assessments of Complications and Quality2002 · 64 citations
  4. 4Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near‐miss1998 · 453 citations