Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Everoshine EECS, a newer-generation ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated stent, in patients with CAD.
What are the safety and efficacy outcomes of the Everoshine everolimus-eluting coronary stent in patients with coronary artery disease?
What are the safety and efficacy outcomes of the Everoshine everolimus-eluting coronary stent in patients with coronary artery disease?
The novel biodegradable polymer-coated Everoshine everolimus-eluting stent demonstrated low rates of MACE and stent thrombosis at 1 year in patients with coronary artery disease.
Everoshine EECS shows acceptable safety in single-arm CAD data; leaves open randomized confirmation versus established stents.
Purpose Everoshine everolimus-eluting coronary stent (EECS) is a newer-generation, ultrathin (65 µm) biodegradable polymer-coated stent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Everoshine EECS in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods This was a single-center, single-arm, prospective study, which enrolled patients aged ≥18 years who had at least one native coronary artery lesion and were eligible for Everoshine EECS implantation. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization, assessed at the 30-day follow-up. Results A total of 193 patients were enrolled (mean age 57.8 ± 11.0 years; 142 [73.6%] male). Of these, 92 (47.7%) patients had ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and 39 (20.2%) had non-STEMI. A total of 267 stents were deployed, with a mean diameter of 2.9 ± 0.4 mm and a mean length of 27.0 ± 9.9 mm. At 30 days, 3 (1.6%) patients experienced MACE, and 2 (1.0%) patients experienced stent thrombosis (ST). Cumulative MACE was observed in 5 (2.6%) patients at one year. Conclusion One-year clinical outcomes demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and safety of the novel biodegradable polymer-coated Everoshine EECS in patients with CAD attributable to native coronary artery stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasturi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: